search

March 17, 2008

Problem with Google alerts

I'm glad I didn't miss last week's story about the researchers who were able to hack into the implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). Worrying that I might miss the next big story about wireless technology, I set up a few Google alerts for several search terms including "medical wireless."

Problem is, I'm getting links to blogs that are merely copying what other sites are writing without attribution. Why wouldn't it be possible to limit these alerts to only well-established sites?

Mahalo announcing new features

I'm supposed to attend a demo by Jason Calacanis tomorrow afternoon in advance of his keynote at the Search Engine Strategy Conference on Wednesday. Mahalo is the human-moderated search directory.

Recently, Newsweek published its Revenge of the Experts, which takes the view that the Web 2.0 user-generated content meme will be replaced by content produced by people who have some knowledge of the topic their presenting on the Web. Jason is quoted in this piece as saying that producing content in this way increases the chance to charge for premium content. He also says, "It's also easier to woo advertisers with the promise of controlled content than with hit-and-miss blog blather." I don't know if Jason is using "experts" to generate content for his directory, or if the scope of his site is as comprehensive as other search engines or even the Wikipedia.

February 09, 2008

Yahoo! to Microsoft: "Show me the money"

The WSJ is prognosticating "Yahoo Board to Reject Microsoft Bid," based on a "a person familiar with the situation."

February 05, 2008

Scoble agrees: Microsoft/Yahoo! mashup targeting mobile search

When I heard about Microsoft's plan to purchase Yahoo!, I immediately thought about this alliance competing against Google for dominance of mobile search.

Here's what Scoble has to say:

2. Google stands to gain HUGE by slowing down this deal. Every month longer that this deal takes is tens of millions in Google’s pockets. Why? Well, the real race today isn’t for search. Isn’t for email. Isn’t for IM. It’s for ownership of your mobile phone. I met the guy who runs China’s telecom last week in Davos. He’s seeing six million new people get a cell phone in China every month. So, every month that Microsoft and Yahoo will be stuck in some courtroom arguing out why this is a good deal means money in the bank for Google as they close mobile phone deal after mobile phone deal.

BTW, I'm working on the final draft of the first edition of my newsletter, and it will contain this and other topics relating to medical wireless technology.

ANOTHER VIEW from TeleCompetitor:

Yahoo and Microsoft have some pretty impressive wireless forays already. Microsoft’s mobile operating system, , is on 150 handsets and is available from over 100 different wireless operators from across the globe. Windows Mobile will ship on about 20 million handsets this year alone. Yahoo has struck wireless alliances with the likes of , , and to feature , including ad and search capabilities. A combined Microsoft-Yahoo could create a compelling integrated suite of services for wireless operators and consumers that may trump anything Google tries to do with . Mobile wireless represents the next big growth engine for broadband. Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google understand that, and they are now positioning themselves to take full advantage of it.

February 01, 2008

Could Microsoft help Yahoo! win the war of mobile search?

The just starting battle for mobile search is what I thought of when I heard this morning's news about the plans by Microsoft for purchasing Yahoo!.

While Google has 75% of the traditional online search advertising market, Yahoo! still leads in online display advertising. From eMarketer.com:

"Google still dominates the market, of course, raking in 75% of US paid search advertising in 2007, up from 60% in 2006. Yahoo! at No. 2 collects a mere 9%, with the other search engines splitting the remaining 16%...."

And search advertising is and will be the big boomer:

"Advertisers spent over $8.6 billion on search in 2007. That figure is expected to nearly double by 2011 to almost $16.6 billion."

But, online display advertising doesn't fare as well:

In 2007, display ads brought in nearly $5 billion. By 2011, eMarketer predicts display spending will reach over $8 billion.

So we can see here that Google has the traditional online search well in hand, but the market for mobile search advertising is wide open at this point. Mobile search advertising is in its infancy now, but I do understand that eMarketer will be coming out with a report on this topic some time this month.

UPDATE: Even Google isn't bulletproof. From Wired's "Google's 4Q Earnings Miss Raises Worries":

Now, it looks like February will begin on a sour note. Google shares fell 6.7 percent, or $37.99, to $526.31 at the open of trading Friday, after the company released fourth-quarter results that missed analysts' expectations.

ANOTHER UPDATE: This table is from the eMarketer report "Mobile Search: Clash of the Titans." They will be updating the data some time this month.

Mobile_search

January 30, 2008

Google leads in worldwide searches by over 60%, but loses to Baidu in China by 34 points

Worldwide_search_2

This chart is provide by comScore.com.

MarketingCharts.com shows this breakdown of searches within China
with data from Analysys International:

Searchchina

Of course, I would more interested in exactly the users they're excluding, namely those using smartphones and connected PDAs. I'm guess that in China this is a greater user base than in the US. I know the Google and Yahoo and in a fierce fight for the mobile market, so I also guess I'll have to do some digging to see if this data is available.

May 01, 2007

Economist: the world of wireless connections

Economist_april_28_cover_sml With this post I'll begin to summarize and discuss some of the salient points from the special report on wireless tech entitled "When everything connects" in the April 28 issue of The Economist (online subscription required).

I'll start off with the podcast featuring their technology correspondent, Ken Cukier.

Even though the interviewer begins by talking about the "almost unlimited developed of wireless technology," Ken correctly points out that the wireless tech is not really new, it's just that barriers to implementation and integration such as cost, lack of business processes or services tailored to support all the possible applications are all part of an immature technology ecosystem that I'll discuss below.

However, with the wide acceptance of the mobile phone--"today, almost 3 billion people use a phone...the industry is adding 1.6 million new subscribers each day"--other areas of wireless tech have benefited mostly due to the economies of scale. Now that 1 billion phones are being shipped per year, many resources can now be applied to other areas of wireless tech.

Such applications as machine-to-machine communication, sensor networking, medical wireless monitoring are "absolutely taking off."

The key trend is that as the microprocessor is paired with the wireless radio, the same cost reduction, size reduction and innovation is seen in wireless tech as that seen in the computing industry.

What are the barriers to development at the present?

First, there is no industry to supply these various applications such as using a wireless connection to adjust the lighting in a building. The major business maintenance companies such as GE, Honeywell, Philips are in the process of instituing these services, but are not there yet.

Second, the cost is still prohibitive. A wireless module might cost $4 at scale, but once it's down to 10 cents "it's gonna happen everywhere." The time scale for this is about 5 to 10 years, since these ideas are just entering the planning cycles of these companies.

The benefits not only include saving energy, but there will be new uses that are not even imagined yet. For the general consumer, these new services will required special marketing and demonstrations just to explain them. Consider the difficulty that the cellular carriers and other companies have faced trying to get the message across about all the advanced features available on smart phones such as GPS, mobile search, and even SMS for some.

Consumers are already familiar with wireless communication services for cars such as the OnStar service, but there are plans that go further than this. Wireless monitors can be used to provide predictive maintenance, or preventive medicine when talking about health care, or in the case of the automobile example, even act as black boxes similar to those used on aircraft, to provide information about who is at fault in the case of an accident. This brings up the very important issue of privacy. And this certainly has implications for the healthcare field.

Again, it will take some explaining to the consumer to ask them to pay for map services or some other benefit they've never realized before. It might be offset by advertising, for instance, in providing coupons as you drive through a certain commercial district, but this could be seen as yet another unwanted distraction in a already infomation-glutted world.

What does the future hold?

The thing about the The Next Great Thing is that no one can predict it. Ken uses the analogy of the electric power grid which was originally developed to power light bulbs in everyone's homes. But, it was the availability of the electric socket that was the killer app in providing development of various appliances which are now considered necessities. Another analogy drawn from the past is made about the electric motor, which due to miniaturization and decreasing cost has found its way into many varied and unimagined applications such as the toothbrush.

This ubiquity could be the fate of wireless tech, where you have "the fridge talking to the kettle," but it also will find its way into transformative uses, especially in medicine and health care which I'll explore in future posts. But, it's important first examine the development of wireless tech in the broad context, which is what I wanted to do with this post. Wireless handheld converged devices, some in the form of a phone or a Web tablet, or in some form not even dreamed of yet, while allowing you to monitor your blood glucose, might also be expected to download and view video, provide speech recognition, etc. I guess some time soon, I'll also have to survey battery technology.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

April 25, 2007

Google Speaker Series: Luiz Barroso

                 
          

[This is the video of the April Speaker Series at the NYC Google offices that I reported on earlier this month. It's now posted at the Google Video Web site. I used their feature that automatically creates a blog post and embeds the video as you can see above. It also adds the text you see in the following paragraphs.]

When your computer begins to look more like a warehouse than a pizza box or a refrigerator, some things that you might otherwise treat as annoying afterthoughts become first order design considerations. The size of our computing infrastructure has given us some early hands-on experience with issues that are now at the forefront of computer science, such as energy-efficiency, fault-tolerance, and thread-level parallelism. In this talk I will try to present some of the broad lessons we have learned as well as our recent research results on disk drive failure analysis and datacenter-level power efficiency.

Luiz André Barroso is a Distinguished Engineer at Google, where he has worked across  several engineering areas, ranging from applications to software infrastructure and hardware design. His projects have included a system to find related academic articles, designing load-balancing software, networking and server performance optimizations, failure analysis, power provisioning, and leading the design of Google's computing platform.

Prior to Google he was a member of the Research Staff at Compaq and Digital Equipment Corporations, where his group did some of the pioneering work on processor and memory system design for commercial workloads. They also designed Piranha, a system based on an aggressive chip-multiprocessing architecture. The work on Piranha has had a significant impact in the microprocessor industry, helping inspire many of the multi-core CPUs that are now in the mainstream.

Before joining Digital he was one of the designers of the USC RPM, an FPGA-based multiprocessor emulator for rapid hardware prototyping. He has also worked at IBM Brazil's Rio Scientific Center and lectured at PUC-Rio (Brazil) and Stanford University.

Luiz has a Ph.D. degree in Computer Engineering from the University of Southern California and B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica, Rio de Janeiro.                

Tags: , , ,

April 13, 2007

Google agreed to acquire Internet ad-services company DoubleClick for $3.1 billion:WSJ

Story to follow shortly, they say.

Update: From the press release...

"It has been our vision to make Internet advertising better -- less intrusive, more effective, and more useful. Together with DoubleClick, Google will make the Internet more efficient for end users, advertisers, and publishers," said Sergey Brin, Google's Co-Founder & President, Technology.

Om reports that rumors were saying the Microsoft was bidding $2 billion for DoubleClick. So essentially, with this purchase, Google stays ahead of the competition with display advertising on the Web.

Update #2: From WSJ Online, "Google's Nosebleed Price for DoubleClick...

But forget about Google vs. Microsoft, the big winner here is Hellman & Friedman, whose original investment on a net basis valued DoubleClick at as little as $600 million, which would mean we’re talking about quintupling in little more than a year.

Technorati Tags: ,

April 12, 2007

Google targets voice searches

This is reported in today's WSJ online (behind the cash curtain):

This story refers to the recent rollout of Google Voice Local Search (1-800-GOOG-411), the automated speech recognition 411 service, as a way of taking the lead against Microsoft, Yahoo and other competitors. GOOG-411 takes the traditional automated 411 a step further by allowing the user to simply mention a type of business (coffee shop), and then an intersection or a ZIP Code, instead of requiring the user to know the name of a business.

Google's test comes less than a month after Microsoft announced plans to buy Tellme Networks Inc. for a price that people familiar with the matter put at $800 million. The closely held Silicon Valley company specializes in services that combine voice-recognition technology with the Web, and already provides automated directory-assistance services for AT&T Inc. and Verizon Wireless, a joint venture of Verizon Communications Inc. and Vodafone Group PLC.

Searching services on cell phones, unlike search on desktops, is still an open market which is why the rush to achieve market share is especially important.

Yahoo has implemented its OneSearch, which was described by Jerry Yang during Jobs' keynote introducing the iPhone. (Eric Schmidt Google at this event.) But now, according to this WSJ article, "Yahoo officials say spoken queries could eventually become an option; two executives from Tellme recently joined Yahoo."

Verizon uses technology from Medio Systems Inc. to help cell phone user choose ring tones, games or other media they want to download to their phone.

With the imminent release of the iPhone (or you could have yours now if you're Madonna), the cell phone search wars will increase in intensity as the public begins to understand the possibilities provided by this new crop of connected, converged devices that can use speech recognition in many ways.

Tags: , , , , , Medio Systems